Area VIII

Infrastructure and Other Learning Resources

3.71 Overall mean rating
39 of 40 indicators rated

Portrait of Engr. Reynald Malag
Message of Commitment

As the Area Leader for Parameter VIII – Infrastructure and Other Learning Resources, I fully commit to upholding the standards of quality, excellence, and continuous improvement required for institutional accreditation. I will lead the systematic preparation, organization, and validation of all documentary evidence, ensuring that the institution's physical facilities, learning resources, laboratories, workshops, libraries, information technology resources, and support services effectively contribute to the achievement of its vision, mission, goals, and objectives. Through collaborative engagement with administrators, faculty members, staff, and stakeholders, I will promote a culture of accountability, compliance, and quality assurance in all accreditation-related activities.

Furthermore, I commit to fostering sustainable and learner-centered infrastructure development by continuously assessing existing resources, identifying areas for improvement, and recommending initiatives that enhance the academic and learning environment. I will ensure that all facilities and resources remain safe, accessible, functional, and responsive to the evolving needs of students, faculty, and the community. Guided by the principles of integrity, professionalism, and service excellence, I will diligently perform my responsibilities to help achieve a successful accreditation outcome and support the institution's pursuit of educational excellence and continuous quality improvement.

Engr. Reynald Malag
Director, Office of Project Management, Physical Plant and Development Services
Institutional Portfolio

Institutional Portfolio

Read it as a bound document, or open the file itself.

Evidence & Ratings

How this area is assessed

Each parameter is judged on its systems, how they are implemented, and what they achieve. Against every indicator is the rating the area gave itself and the document that evidences it.

3.71
Overall mean rating
39 of 40 indicators rated · 40 of 40 evidenced
A School Campus/Site 3.78 10 indicators
Indicator Rating Means of Verification
System — Inputs and Processes
S.1 The school campus/site meets the requirements on location, accessibility, topography, soil condition, size and disaster/risk reduction. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
System — Inputs and Processes mean 4.00
Implementation
I.1 Current policies on environmental management and sustainable development approaches are evident and cascaded into the faculty, students and stakeholders. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.2 The existing school site complies with the national standard requirements set by the government. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.3 The institution conducts periodic analysis of water quality and disposes its wastes properly. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Implementation mean 3.67
Outcome/s
O.1 Campus-related accidents are minimal. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.2 Campus is adaptable to changes in climate and resilient to tremors and storms. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.3 Campus environment and landscape are impressive and well-maintained. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.4 Permanence of the academic campus and buildings in the present site is ensured. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.5 Number of guest lecturers/visitors/students visiting the campus or doing academic work has improved/increased. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.6 The campus usually gets the praise of everyone who visits it. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Outcome/s mean 3.67
Parameter mean 3.78
Best Practices Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
B Infrastructure 3.89 14 indicators
Indicator Rating Means of Verification
System — Inputs and Processes
S.1 There are adequate buildings and provisions for classrooms, offices, staff rooms, study areas, clinics, student center, cafeteria, food outlets, comfort rooms and other amenities equipped with needed facilities. 3.50 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.1.1 The existing school infrastructure and facilities meet the academic, administrative and other needs of the institution. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.1.2 School infrastructures conform to standards of comfort to students, faculty, staff and other stakeholders with special needs. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.2 The institution has a system for periodic maintenance, repair and upkeep of its buildings and facilities. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.3 There are trained manpower to handle maintenance, repair and upkeep works. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
System — Inputs and Processes mean 3.83
Implementation
I.1 There is optimum utilization of existing infrastructure and facilities by faculty and students. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.2 Funds are allocated for the repair and maintenance of buildings and facilities. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.3 The institution regularly monitors the condition of its buildings and facilities to within fully functional status. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.4 School infrastructures are built in compliance with national standards in terms of design; strength to withstand earthquakes, typhoons, fire hazards and other natural and man-made calamities; or other operational requirements such as sanitary permits, building certificates, environmental compliance, etc. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.5 The existing school infrastructures are periodically monitored and improved to meet the current and emerging needs of education and training. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.6 Risk identification and analysis; and control activities are conducted and properly documented. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Implementation mean 3.83
Outcome/s
O.1 Improved faculty and student performance are based on student/faculty satisfaction. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.2 Accidents due to infrastructure are minimal. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.3 Stakeholders are proud of and happy about the school facilities. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Outcome/s mean 4.00
Parameter mean 3.89
Best Practices Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
C Laboratories and Shops 3.83 10 indicators
Indicator Rating Means of Verification
System — Inputs and Processes
S.1 There are adequate and properly maintained laboratories and shops to support the academic programs of the institution. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.2 Laboratories and shop rooms are equipped with functional tools, equipment, supplies and materials to support student learning. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.3 Adequate funds are available for the proper maintenance of laboratories and shops. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
System — Inputs and Processes mean 4.00
Implementation
I.1 Equipment/tools and supplies/materials in the laboratories and shops are regularly checked and cleaned. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.2 There are provisions to minimize exposure to risks and to prevent accidents in the laboratories and workshops. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.3 A well-placed and marked emergency materials are strategically located in the laboratories and shops. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.4 Laboratories and shops have two doors that open out for ease of movement during emergency. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Implementation mean 3.50
Outcome/s
O.1 Faculty and students’ productivity are improved because of their access to laboratories and shop room facilities that may be needed to learn particular skills in the program. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.2 The good condition of classrooms, offices and laboratories and other facilities are contributory to the achievement of desired learning outcomes. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.3 There is minimal danger of accidents occurring in laboratories and shop rooms. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Outcome/s mean 4.00
Parameter mean 3.83
Best Practices Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
D Non-Print, Digital and Electronic Resources 3.33 6 indicators
Indicator Rating Means of Verification
System — Inputs and Processes
S.1 Provisions for non-print, digital and electronic resources are available. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
S.2 Funds are budgeted for purchase of non-print, digital and electronic resources. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
System — Inputs and Processes mean 3.00
Implementation
I.1 Memos issued regarding provisions for non-print, digital and electronic resources are religiously followed. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
I.2 Purchase of updated non-print, digital and electronic resources is regularly done. 3 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Implementation mean 3.00
Outcome/s
O.1 Completed projects and compilation of lectures are promptly reported and submitted. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
O.2 Faculty and staff have better presentations and up-to-date reports. 4 Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)
Outcome/s mean 4.00
Parameter mean 3.33
Best Practices Click to view MOVs attached (opens in a new tab)